Climate Physics Institute

Open Letter from scientists, Wall Street Journal

[Open Letter #4: Authors of Open Letter #1 reply to Open Letters #2 and #3.]

The interest generated by our Wall Street Journal op-ed of Jan. 27, “No Need to Panic about Global Warming,” is gratifying but so extensive that we will limit our response to the letter to the editor the Journal published on Feb. 1, 2012 by Kevin Trenberth and 37 other signatories, and to the Feb. 6 letter by Robert Byer, President of the American Physical Society. (We, of course, thank the writers of supportive letters.) Continue reading →

Open Letter #3 from APS President, Wall Street Journal

[This letter also responds to Open Letter #1]

The Jan. 27 op-ed “No Need to Panic About Global Warming” is inaccurate in its characterization of the Climate Change Statement of the American Physical Society (APS), the nation’s leading organization of physicists with more than 50,000 members. Continue reading →

Open Letter #2 from Opposing Scientists, Wall Street Journal

[This letter responds to Open Letter #1 below.]

Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work. If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a large number of the proposed operations.

You published “No Need to Panic About Global Warming” (op-ed, Jan. 27) on climate change by the climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology. While accomplished in their own fields, most of these authors have no expertise in climate science. Continue reading →

Open Letter #1 from Scientists, Wall Street Journal

[Several signors to this letter contributed to the exhibits used by Climate Physics Institute in its successful Intervention of the Climate Petition by Our Children's Trust, which would have forced the climate fraud upon Montana's citizens and economy. - Ed]

________________________________________

A candidate for public office in any contemporary democracy may have to consider what, if anything, to do about “global warming.” Candidates should understand that the oft-repeated claim that nearly all scientists demand that something dramatic be done to stop global warming is not true. In fact, a large and growing number of distinguished scientists and engineers do not agree that drastic actions on global warming are needed. Continue reading →